| Titre | Pour une histoire populaire de la psychanalyse. De quoi Ernest Jones est-il le nom ? | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Florent Gabarron-Garcia | |
 |
Revue | Actuel Marx |
| Numéro | no 58, octobre 2015 Histoire et luttes de classes | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | Interventions |
|
| Page | 159-171 | |
| Résumé anglais |
For a popular history of psychoanalysis. Of what is Ernest Jones the name? A number of textbooks in the field of psychoanalysis go so far as to suggest that Freud would have been astonished by the implications of the French psychoanalytic movement in the “1968 moment”. The position today dominant in the psychoanalytic mainstream is that in the aftermath of those years when the movement had drifted astray, psychiatry and psychoanalysis eventually attained their “age of reason”. In parallel, this doxa foregrounds what is a rather singular historiography concerning the relations between analysts and the military institution in the interwar years. Didn't Freud, after all, discover the death-bearing repetition complex through the problem of war trauma ? And if this is the case, then what is termed the « Freudian indifferentiation » could be coupled with what is qualified as the « Freudian pessimism », object of an interminable and predictable commentary in contemporary psychoanalysis. The consequences are the relegation and marginalization of a number of other crucial facts, which together sketch the contours of an entirely different history. The issue of such a popular history of psychoanalysis, and of the factors leading to its being forgotten by the doxa of the 1980s, is addressed in the present article. Source : Éditeur (via Cairn.info) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=AMX_058_0159 |
