| Titre | Pérestroïka et classe ouvrière | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | David Mandel | |
 |
Revue | L'Homme et la société |
| Numéro | no 88-89, 2e et 3e trimestre 1988 Staline est mort hier : L'émergence du social en U.R.S.S. | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | L'URSS vue d'URSS. Dossier Écologie en U.R.S.S. |
|
| Page | 119-137 | |
| Résumé anglais |
David Mandel, Perestroïka and the Working Class
The overall objective of this article is to examine the assertion that the reform presently being carried out in the USSR does not have a class content. Although this reform has not created the extended market envisaged by economists like Shmelev, it is nevertheless inspired by this model and is considered to be step in that direction. Consequently, A. Aganbeguian, an economic advisor close to Gorbatchev, has admitted that, from his point of view, the reform adopted by the Central Committee in June 1987 is not perfectly adapted by economic needs. It is rather a compromise between those who desire a more rapid and radical change and the partisans of a slower evolution of the economic system. Mandel attempts to respond to the following questions : to what degree is the perspective of the working class reflected in the public debate over the reform ? In what ways does the reform correspond to the preoccupations and interests of workers ? And, if the reform does not address itself to the needs of workers, what kind of a reform would do so ? Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/homso_0018-4306_1988_num_88_2_2345 |
