| Titre | La pluralité des temps chez les théoriciens socialistes (1820-1870) | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Pierre Ansart | |
 |
Revue | L'Homme et la société |
| Numéro | no 90, 4e trimestre 1988 Le temps et la mémoire aujourd'hui | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | Le temps et la mémoire aujourd'hui |
|
| Page | 15-24 | |
| Résumé anglais |
Pierre Ansart, The Plurality of Time in Socialist Thought (1820- 1870)
The first socialist theorists shared the idea of a rupture in historical continuity, of a revolution announcing the beginning of a new world rich in new temporal rhythms. But their conceptions of this new social time diverge in major ways. Saint-Simon, Eugène Buret, and Constantin Pecqueur see time broken by succeeding social systems and they analyze the temporality created by the development of the industrial economy. Fourier rejects this conception as suspect, because it preserves the notion of continuity between the old world and the new. In this debate, Marx's position is similar to that of the saint-simonians, but he refines considerably the analysis of temporalities proper to capitalism, the working class and, especially, of revolutions, in which he distinguishes multiple and conflictual rhythms. Proudhon turns the discussion in a mutualist and federalist direction, seeing a plurality of times and warning of the risk of reducing practice to a single temporal hegemony. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/homso_0018-4306_1988_num_90_4_2363 |
