| Titre | Linguistique/écriture/pédagogie : champs de pertinence et transferts illégaux | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Bernard Lahire | |
 |
Revue | L'Homme et la société |
| Numéro | no 101, 3e trimestre 1991 Théorie du sujet et théorie sociale | |
| Page | 109-119 | |
| Résumé anglais |
Bernard Lahire, Linguistics, Writing, Pedagogy : Pertinent Fields and Illegal Transferts
For a long time, "writing" will be thought of by philosophers and linguists as being secondary in relation to "discourse". The paradox lies in the fact that the maligned "writing" is at the foundation of linguistic methods and theories. Saussurian linguistics, to take one of the most pure theories of language signs, always discusses a totality of written and graphic practices, and especially scholastic writing practices, without being aware of this fact Mikhaïl Bakhtine, who has developed the point rejects this theory too rapidly. If the pertinent field of Saussurian linguistics lies in the totality of scholastic writing practices, then this is not a false theory. Bakhtine is wrong to not see why Saussure is partially right. In this particular case, we can elucidate questions such as : what are we talking about ? what is its pertinent field ? does it not speak of a particular category of social phenomena while it claims to speak of social phenomena in general ? Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/homso_0018-4306_1991_num_101_3_2564 |
