| Titre | Salaire et marché du travail chez Marx et Keynes : orthodoxie ou hétérodoxie ? | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Michel de Vroey, Philippe de Ville | |
 |
Revue | Cahiers d'économie politique |
| Numéro | no 10-11, printemps-automne 1985 L'hétérodoxie dans la pensée économique | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | I. Les fondements analytiques d'une hétérodoxie économique A. L'orthodoxie et sa critique |
|
| Page | 67-90 | |
| Résumé anglais |
The aim of this article is to assess the «heterodox» character of Marx' and Keynes' positions about wage and labour market theories. In a first part we present our interpretation of the distinction between «orthodox» and «heterodox» points of view. The two subsequent parts are devoted to the analysis of the contribution of Marx and Keynes in light of this distinction. Our thesis is that they both hold ambiguous positions, each for a different reason. Marx has elaborated conceptual tools which could have led him to an heterodox viewpoint ; however, he failed to draw their implications and has thereby fallen back to a position integrating wage theory into a general equilibrium approach. Keynes, on the other hand, while not really bothering about conceptual premisses, has better perceived the theoretical necessity of isolating the labour markets and to relate, at least implicitely, the domination of capital over labour to this feature. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cep_0154-8344_1985_num_10_1_998 |
