| Titre | Rationalité microéconomique et circulation macroéconomique : Keynes et Schumpeter | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Richard Arena | |
 |
Revue | Cahiers d'économie politique |
| Numéro | no 10-11, printemps-automne 1985 L'hétérodoxie dans la pensée économique | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | I. Les fondements analytiques d'une hétérodoxie économique C. Monnaie et circuit macroéconomique |
|
| Page | 149-168 | |
| Résumé anglais |
This paper tries to show that the first sight differences which allow to establish a distinction between Keynes' and Schumpeter's approaches and were traditionaly described by commentators were overemphasised. The analysis of both authors are indeed rooted in a common perspective. They are related to the originality of the treatment of microeconomic hypothesis, to \the principles which rule the theory of circulation and to the relations between micro and macroeconomic analytical levels. These common points differ drastically from the thesis defended by marginalist and neo-marginalist approaches. They tend to favour the study of macroeconomic constraints-of microeconomics rather than the analysis of microeconomic foundations of macroeconomics. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cep_0154-8344_1985_num_10_1_1004 |
