| Titre | Smith, Ricardo, Keynes : vie et mort du «prodigue» et du «projector» | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Daniel Diatkine | |
 |
Revue | Cahiers d'économie politique |
| Numéro | no 10-11, printemps-automne 1985 L'hétérodoxie dans la pensée économique | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | II. Hétérodoxie et histoire du capitalisme C. Hétérodoxie et méthode de l'économie politique |
|
| Page | 409-419 | |
| Résumé anglais |
This paper aims at justifying this exclusion by showing that economic known that the author of the General Theory held opposite views to those of Marx on that point, since he left A. Smith out of the field of classical analysis.
This paper aims at justifying this exclusion by showing that economics agents identified by the terms «prodigal» and «projector» are still to be found in the Wealth of Nations, the former confusing capital and revenue, the latter misemploying the capital.
Those two types of agents are then shewn to disappear from ricardian analysis when Ricardo had definitively adopted the principle «industry is limited by capital», the ricardian form of Say's Law. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cep_0154-8344_1985_num_10_1_1021 |
