| Titre | Quelques réflexions à propos de l'article : « Monnaie et Marchandise» de R. Hilferding. | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Arnaud Rys, Achille Decot | |
 |
Revue | Cahiers d'économie politique |
| Numéro | no 13, printemps 1987 Conceptions de la monnaie : un enjeu théorique | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | Conception de la monnaie : un enjeu théorique |
|
| Page | 185-190 | |
| Résumé anglais |
In this criticism of the quantitative theory of money, Hilferding tries, in a text called «Money and Commodity», to investigate the theory of money as a commodity. For that purpose, he uses a new notion : the unlimited demand. But then, he meets a difficulty which occurs in Marx's theory, and is inherent in his theory, that is : the socialisation of the gold producers' private works. The notion of unlimited demand is thus to be taken as a point of no return which, in actual fact, gives money a value, independent of any exchange. Such a set-back obviously leads us to the other ways of research, in which the notion of money would prevail over the notion of commodity. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cep_0154-8344_1987_num_13_1_1049 |
