| Titre | Ambiguïté ou ambivalence de la notion de marché | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Roger Frydman | |
 |
Revue | Cahiers d'économie politique |
| Numéro | no 20-21, printemps-automne 1992 Formes et sciences du marché | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | Nouveaux savoirs sur les marchés |
|
| Page | 213-229 | |
| Résumé anglais |
If economists are all talking about the market, they designate with this word different entities according to their institutions or the way they are regulated. The market can denote an economy adjusted by prices and/or hierarchies, an economy with or without money, with or without goods being all merchandises, with or without organizations, with one or different kinds of agents. . . This ambiguity lies in the fact that the market is more a scientific approach, concerned by all social forms that can be described according to the postulate of individual rationality, rather than a defined territory. Conversely, the programme of ambivalence takes for granted that the market is a part of a system including other social structures and rules. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cep_0154-8344_1992_num_20_1_1134 |
