| Titre | Théories de l'action et normativité chez Adam Smith et chez John C. Harsanyi | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Feriel Kandil, Andréa Fernandes | |
 |
Revue | Cahiers d'économie politique |
| Numéro | no 33, hiver 1998 | |
| Page | 137-159 | |
| Résumé anglais |
Theories of Action and Normativity.
Harsanyi's account of the rational ethical behaviour refers explicitly to A. Smith's mecanism of the impartial spectator. A comparison between the two authors shows important differences concerning the impartial spectator's moral judgement. In Harsanyi's case, it is a determinant judgement that calculates the consequences of actions according to moral preferences. For Smith, the impartial spectator operates in an analogical manner to evaluate the actor's motives in specific situations.lt is a reflective judgement, in Kant's sens. The article delves into the different conceptions of actions and relations between morals and economics that lie between these two kinds of judgement. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cep_0154-8344_1998_num_33_1_1239 |
