| Titre | Compléments circonstanciels ou appositions ? | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | D. Leeman | |
 |
Revue | Langue française |
| Numéro | no 125, février 2000 Nouvelles recherches sur l'apposition, sous la direction de Franck Neveu | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | Frontières fonctionnelles de l'apposition |
|
| Page | 18-29 | |
| Résumé anglais |
Contemporary studies on apposition no longer take into account, as one of its characteristics, the traditional criterion of co-reference , understood as a virtual (lexical) or actual (referential) identity; from this point of view, certain adverbial complements may be considered as appositions. However, the study of numerous prepositional groups introduced by dans shows that the notion of co-reference is useful when it comes to distinguishing analytically between two types of functions an adverbial complement may have, in so far as its meaning may be circumstantial (e.g. of cause, manner, place) or else correspond to the verbal idea : thus, the decision to dissolve the National Assembly constitutes a mistake in a sentence such as Dans sa décision de dissoudre l'assemblée, Chirac a commis une erreur. Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.persee.fr/doc/lfr_0023-8368_2000_num_125_1_6389 |
