Contenu du sommaire
Revue | Cahiers d'économie politique |
---|---|
Numéro | no 38, printemps 2001 |
Texte intégral en ligne | Accessible sur l'internet |
- En mémoire de Louis-André Gérard-Varet - p. 7-8
- Erratum. Résumés de l'article de Jean Magnan de Bornier, intitulé "Cournot avant Nash : Grandeur et limites d'un modèle unitaire de la concurrence" - p. 9
- Malthus and Classical Economies : The Malthus-Ricardo Relationship - Samuel Hollander p. 11-23 The problem of placing Malthus within the 'classical school' can be approached by investigating the Ricardo-Malthus relationship. I find no substantive differences on value or canonical growth theory. Malthus's population policy was directed against upper-class, military and Church ideology, a position shared with Ricardo. A major analytical difference entails Malthus's ascription to agriculture of a superior productivity reflecting Physiocratic surplus theorizing ; were it not that he abandoned his agricultural protectionism any notion of a unified 'classical' doctrine would be compromised. As for the aggregate demand problem, the divide is narrowed by Malthus's surprisingly orthodox perspective on monetary and fiscal policy.
- L'épistémologie de Keynes et "l'hypothèse Wittgenstein" : La cohérence logique de la Théorie Générale de l'emploi, de l'intérêt et de la monnaie - Christophe Lavialle p. 25-64 A rereading of the so-called "Wittgenstein Assumption" (Favereau, 1985) in the light of the evolution of the philosophical thought of Wittgenstein himself leads us to propose a reinterpretation of the "pragmatic nature" of the epistemology of the General Theory ; thence to underline the complete coherence of this book, based on Wittgenstein's idea of "therapeutic" formal logic.
- La méthode de la Théorie Générale selon Patinkin - Edith Klimovski p. 65-78 The analytical argument justifying the evolution of Patinkin's position on the method employed in the General Theory leads to a severe ambiguity : the Keynésien model is supposed to express Walrasian interactions as well as Marshallian partial equilibrium. Patinkin synthétises his position by using a mysterious paraphrase of Genesis, which expresses, as we show, the predominance of the Walrasian method. Interactions are the only reason given by Patinkin to explain the connection between the Keynesian model and the Walrasian method. This paper shows that they are only a necessary condition because mis model also has important commun points with the classical tradition which separate it from Walras.
- Le tâtonnement "marshallien" dans les premiers écrits d'Oskar Lange - Émeric Lendjel p. 79-114 Based on Lange's neglected first writings (Lange 1932, 1935a, 1935b), this article shows that Lange developed an original conception of market adjustment processes in his famous 1936-7 article. In particular, two points are showed here. 1/ Lange developed an original model that described the lagged and progressive adjustment process of supply in industrial sectors (completing the cobweb diagram that concern mainly agricultural sectors). 2/ Lange tried to articulate these different an particular models in a general frame which corresponds to the tâtonnement. The article shows that this conception is related to a marshallian approach rather than to a walrassian one.
Débats
- L'histoire des théories économiques sous le prisme de l'hétérodoxie. Une analyse critique de l'Histoire de la pensée économique de Ghislain Deleplace - Michel De Vroey p. 115-133 The aim of this article is to criticize two claims made by Deleplace in his recent Histoire de la pensée économique. First, I criticize the widespread claim that effective demand deficiencies can explain the existence of involuntary unemployment. Second, I question Deleplace's account of the history of macroeconomics from Hicks to the present in terms of an absorption of macroeconomics into microeconomics.
- L'histoire des théories économiques sous le prisme de l'hétérodoxie. Une analyse critique de l'Histoire de la pensée économique de Ghislain Deleplace - Michel De Vroey p. 115-133
Édition : Un discours de M. Henry Thornton le 7 mai 1811 devant le Parlement anglais
Présentation
- Henry Thornton devant le Parlement anglais en 1811 : Les dangers d'un état monétaire "artificiel" - Marie-Thérèse Boyer-Xambeu p. 137-140
Traduction
- Un discours de M. Henry Thorton, 7 mai 181 12 - Robert Lazarevic, Marie-Thérèse Boyer-Xambeu p. 141-155
Notes bibliographiques
- Alain Beraud, Introduction à l'analyse macroéconomique, 4ème édition, 1999 - Frédérique Cerisier p. 159-162
- Éric Keslassy, Le libéralisme de Tocqueville à l'épreuve du paupérisme, 2000 - Franck Viffry p. 163-165
- André Nicolai, Comportement économique et structures sociales, 1999 - Philippe Steiner p. 167-174
- Gilles Dostaler, Le Libéralisme de Hayek, Collection "Repères", 2001 - Carlo Benetti p. 175-179