Contenu du sommaire : What counts as evidence in linguistics ? The case of innateness 

What counts as evidence in linguistics ? The case of innateness 

• Preface - Penke M., Rosenbach A. p. 477-479
• What counts as evidence in linguistics? An introduction - Penke M., Rosenbach A. p. 480-526
• Typological evidence and Universal Grammar - Newmeyer F.J. p. 527-548
• Remarks on the relation between language typology and Universal Grammar: Commentary on Newmeyer - Baltin M. p. 549-553
• Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description? - Haspelmath M. p. 554-579
• Remarks on description and explanation in grammar: Commentary on Haspelmath - Aissen J., Bresnan J. p. 580-583
• Author's response - Haspelmath M. p. 584-586
• From UG to Universals: Linguistic adaptation through iterated learning - Kirby S., Smith K., Brighton H. p. 587-607
• Form, meaning and speakers in the evolution of language: Commentary on Kirby, Smith and Brighton - Croft W. p. 608-611
• Author's response - Kirby S., Smith K., Brighton H. p. 612-614
• Why assume UG? - Wunderlich D. p. 615-641
• What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Commentary on Wunderlich - Tomasello M. p. 642-645
• Author's response: Is there any evidence that refutes the UG hypothesis? - Wunderlich D. p. 646-647
• A question of relevance: Some remarks on standard languages - Weiß H. p. 648-674
• The Relevance of Variation: Remarks on Weiß's Standard-Dialect-Problem - Simon H.J. p. 675-679
• Author's response - Helmut Weiß p. 680-681
• Universals, innateness and explanation in second language acquisition - Eckman F.R. p. 682-703
• 'Internal' versus 'external' universals: Commentary on Eckman - White L. p. 704-706
• Author's response: 'External' universals and explanation in SLA - Eckman F.R. p. 707-709
• What counts as evidence in historical linguistics? - Fischer O. p. 710-740
• Abstraction and performance: Commentary on Fischer - Lightfoot D.W. p. 741-744
• Author's response - Fischer O. p. 745-747