Contenu du sommaire : Special Issue : Epistemic Democracy, Deliberative Quality and Expertise

Original Articles

• Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable - Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander p. 235-350
• Assessing the epistemic quality of democratic decision-making in terms of adequate support for conclusions - Henrik Friberg-Fernros, Johan Karlsson Schaffer p. 251-265
• Balancing epistemic quality and equal participation in a system approach to deliberative democracy - Simone Chambers p. 266-276
• Beyond the Fact of Disagreement? The Epistemic Turn in Deliberative Democracy - Hélène Landemore p. 277-295
• Is moral deference reasonably acceptable? - Martin Ebeling p. 296-309
• Proceduralism and the epistemic dilemma of Supreme Courts - Federica Liveriero, Daniele Santoro p. 310-323
• Tracking justice democratically - Andreas Follesdal p. 324-339
• Validity and scope as criteria for deliberative epistemic quality across pluralism - Andrew Knops p. 340-350