| Titre | La question du formalisme moscovite | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Catherine Depretto | |
 |
Revue | Revue des Etudes Slaves |
| Numéro | Vol. 79, no 1-2, 2008 | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | Communications de la délégation française au XIVe Congrès international des slavistes. Ohrid, 10-16 septembre 2008 Articles |
|
| Page | 87-101 | |
| Résumé anglais |
About the Russian School of Russian Formalism
Usually Russian Formalism is symbolized by the so called Opojaz of Petrograd (1915-1930) and by the works of its chief members, Šklovskij, Èjxenbaum, Tynjanov, Tomaševskij. However in Moscow there was also a Formalist group, whose central personalities were at the beginning Roman Jakobson, later G. O. Vinokur and B. I. Jarxo. Their activity is linked with the Moscow Linguistic Circle (1915-1924) and with the GAXN (1921-1929). According to some scholars, mainly M. I. Šapir (1962-2006), the legacy of the Moscow group is much more signifîcant that the Petrograd' s one.
The paper gives an account of the activity of the Moscow formaliste, of its less known members such as M. M. Kenigsberg, A. I. Romm and B. V. Gornung, and underlines the main points of differences between Moscow and Petrograd. Finally the author tries to answer the question: is it relevant to speak of a Moscow school of Russian Formalism? Source : Éditeur (via Persée) |
|
| Article en ligne | https://www.persee.fr/doc/slave_0080-2557_2008_num_79_1_7127 |
