| Titre | Le programme français de réarmement de 1944-1945 | |
|---|---|---|
| Auteur | Stéphane Weiss | |
 |
Revue | Revue historique |
| Numéro | no 693, janvier 2020 | |
| Rubrique / Thématique | Articles |
|
| Page | 193-215 | |
| Résumé |
Le programme de réarmement initié durant l'automne 1944 en France, par le général de Gaulle, au sein des régions libérées, reste un sujet peu parcouru, relégué dans l'ombre de l'amalgame des Forces françaises de l'Intérieur (FFI) au sein de la 1re Armée française. Le gouvernement provisoire a vainement tenté d'obtenir en métropole un programme de livraisons américaines similaires à celles ayant permis l'équipement de huit divisions en Afrique du Nord en 1943-1944. Sous l'angle de ces seules livraisons, l'échec fut patent et il serait tentant de limiter le réarmement français de 1944-1945 à cette seule dimension. La France a pourtant mis sur pied dix nouvelles divisions en métropole avant le 8 mai 1945, dont sept ayant connu des engagements avant cette date. Le gouvernement français ne s'est pas contenté du seul levier américain et a emprunté des voies alternatives que cet article propose d'exposer, sous un angle évaluatif. Source : Éditeur (via Cairn.info) |
|
| Résumé anglais |
Rearming France was one of the main aims scheduled in September 1944 by general de Gaulle, head of the French provisional government. The liberation of a main part of the country and of its population, considered as a potential military manpower, gave him an opportunity to engage and implement such a policy. Nevertheless, the French government couldn't work alone. Following the rearmament allowed in 1943 in French North Africa by the allied headquarters, the development of the French military plans depended on the allied agreement, mostly the American one. The French army's resurgence, requiring war material and a supply chain, was indeed relying on American military furniture. Moreover the engagement of the rebuilt French forces was exclusively determined by the allied headquarters. In this constrained frame, general de Gaulle had only limited degrees of latitude.
On the 30th November 1944, after five months of rough negotiations with the American War Department and the Supreme Headquarters of Allied Expeditionary Forces in West Europe, the French government fixed a program of rearmament integrating the formation of ten new divisions. Its implementation went from Charybdis to Scylla, with a succession of crisis due to strong and persistent disagreements concerning the French priorities. French and American points of view did not converge. However the French choices were weakened by lacks of coherence. Therefore, the French program seemed quickly doomed to failure.
Over the years, the French rearmament policy promoted in 1944-1945 received little attention, with a perspective mainly restricted to the failed American deliveries. Though, in May 1945, despite the near absence of the American equipment initially wished, the ten new divisions announced in November 1944 have been created, partially outfitted and, for some of them, engaged in the last operations against the German forces. The French government found alternative solutions to achieve its goals, taking advantages of unexpected initiatives conducted by former members of the French resistance. Thus, using tools of public policy evaluation, this paper aims to explain and expose the paths followed by the French rearmament program of 1944-1945. Source : Éditeur (via Cairn.info) |
|
| Article en ligne | http://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=RHIS_201_0193 |
